Towards a Discussion of the Generative Condition of the Architectural Model

This paper proposes reflection on the model’s place in definition of architect’s thought. The representation – and, accordingly, model, too is assumed as an instance where design thought becomes comprehensible, and not just something else that can be communicated. generative condition model assumed, decisive for this recognition radical distinction will always exist between its object. Both apparent natural proximity architectural objects, whereby said result three-dimensionality building dimension both share, concordance architect's are called into question. Because aim to understand ‘how’ architect thinks, 'what' they think when use a executed from perspective horizon ‘anteriority’, ‘anteriority’ ontological merely chronological. examined means ordering thought, is, way giving it existence. results crossing previous research drawing (Anonymous, 2016; Anonymous, 2017). confrontation ‘generative power’ drawing, identified by Robin Evans (1997b), with effect’' explored Peter Eisenman (1981a; 1981b). principle ‘logical Argumentation’, defined Groat Wang (2002), method inquiry.